MSP PSA Software: 11 Tools Compared on Price and Features

Updated: October 2026

You are either choosing your first PSA or staring at your current one wondering what else is out there. This compares 11 PSA tools for MSPs on published pricing, ticketing depth, billing, and contract terms, with three-year cost math for a 10-tech shop. No affiliate links, no sponsored placement. Disclosure: we build OpenFrame.

TL;DR

• Under 5 techs. ITFlow if you can self-host on Linux, or Syncro or DeskDay for a vendor-backed tool at a low price.
• 5-15 techs. DeskDay or SuperOps.
• 10-50 techs who customize heavily. HaloPSA, paired with a separate RMM.
• 30+ techs with a dedicated ops owner. ConnectWise PSA.
• Low device counts per tech. Under roughly 60 to 150 devices per technician, per-device pricing such as OpenFrame's costs less than per-tech plans.

Best PSA Software for MSPs by Team Size

Team size and devices per technician narrow the list faster than any feature grid. Find the row that describes your shop.

PSA Software Comparison: Pricing and Contract Terms

List prices and terms as each vendor publishes them on its own pricing page, checked October 2026. Three vendors quote privately, and the table says so.

PSA Software Comparison: Core Features

What each tool covers on the service desk side, and what else comes in the same subscription.

What PSA Software Costs Over Three Years

Every vendor quotes a monthly per-seat number, which makes the tools look closer together than they are. Here is the same math run out to 36 months for a 10-technician MSP on list pricing and annual billing.

The quote-only vendors are the reason this table has gaps, and the gaps are worth reading carefully. Third-party trackers put ConnectWise PSA list pricing around $25 to $35 per tech per month, while Vendr's data from 15 or more closed deals shows PSA and RMM bundles averaging about $9,000 a year, with enterprise agreements above $85,000. Those two figures cannot both describe the same purchase, which tells you the negotiated range is wide and the number you get depends on how you negotiate. Our Kaseya renewal negotiation playbook covers how to work that spread, and Kaseya CMQ billing explains what changed on recent Datto and Autotask invoices.

Per-Device Versus Per-Tech: Where the Crossover Sits

Per-tech pricing is the default in this category, but it is not always the cheaper model. A per-device platform charges by endpoint regardless of headcount, so the comparison turns on one number: how many devices each of your technicians manages.

At $1 per device per month, here is the ratio where each per-tech tool costs the same amount.

Below the number in the right column, per-device billing costs less. Above it, per-tech billing wins and the gap widens fast. Divide your total managed endpoints by your billable technician count and you will know which side of the line you sit on before you take a single sales call. On annual billing, OpenFrame drops to $0.80 per device, which moves every break-even point up by a quarter.

How We Compared These PSA Tools

Every list price on this page comes from the vendor's own pricing page, checked in October 2026: Atera, SuperOps, and Syncro on October 7, the rest on October 14. Reviews quoted below come from G2 or Capterra within the last 12 months, and community input comes from public r/msp threads linked inline. Where a vendor does not publish, that is stated and third-party data (SelectHub, Vendr, ITQlick, Oreate) fills the gap.

No vendor paid for placement and there are no affiliate links. The reviews below are not a ranking: the right PSA depends on your team size and device-to-tech ratio rather than on a score.

PSA Ticketing System Requirements That Matter

Ticketing is where a PSA either saves your techs time or quietly costs them an hour a day. When you run a trial, these are the things worth testing before you look at anything else.

• Intake channels. Email, portal, phone, and chat should all land in one queue. If your clients live in Microsoft Teams, test that path specifically.
• Time capture. A timer that starts from the ticket, not a separate timesheet screen. Anything that makes techs re-enter time gets skipped, and unbilled hours follow.
• Contract and SLA mapping. The ticket should know which client, which contract, and which SLA clock applies without a tech choosing from a dropdown.
• Asset context. Opening a ticket should show the device, its warranty, and its recent alerts. This is where a native RMM and PSA pairing earns its keep.
• Billing handoff. Approved time should reach an invoice without a CSV export. Ask to see the full path in a demo. For the wider picture, see our breakdown of the MSP billing software problem.
• Bulk actions and export. Test how you would get your data out on day one, not after you sign.

If you are still working out where ticketing ends and monitoring begins, PSA vs RMM covers the split. For general IT service desks outside the MSP model, our guide to IT ticketing software is the better starting point.

PSA Tools for MSPs, Reviewed One by One

OpenFrame

OpenFrame is an open, AI-native infrastructure layer for IT and security, with a native PSA built in rather than bolted on. Ticketing, SLA tracking, and a client portal run on the same data model as the RMM, remote access, MDM, and SIEM, so an alert becomes a ticket with the right asset, client, and contract already attached. There is no sync job between two systems and no second vendor for the service desk.

Pricing is $1 per device per month with unlimited technician seats, which inverts the per-tech math every other tool here uses. For a lean team managing a lot of endpoints, per-tech wins. For a bigger team managing fewer devices per head, per-device comes out ahead. Two built-in AI agents handle the repetitive work so techs spend their hours on the tickets that need judgement: Fae runs client intake and diagnostics, Mingo handles scripting and patch enforcement. Moonscape Business Solutions cut response time 40% after consolidating onto it. OpenFrame's native RMM covers how the monitoring side works.

The fair caveat is that it is newer than ConnectWise, Autotask, or HaloPSA, so the third-party connector catalog is shorter and a few modules (EDR, backup, SSO) are still rolling out.

When it fits: Teams wanting native PSA and RMM in one platform, predictable per-device pricing, and the option to own the stack instead of renting it.

When it does not: You need a deep marketplace of third-party connectors today, or a long track record before you trust your service desk to a younger platform.

ConnectWise PSA

ConnectWise does not publish pricing. You fill out a form, take a sales call, and negotiate. Third-party data tells a clearer story: SelectHub puts it near $25 per user per month, Oreate near $35 per tech per month, and Vendr's data from 15 or more closed deals shows PSA and RMM bundles averaging around $9,000 a year. Enterprise agreements run above $85,000.

The feature list is the widest in this category. Ticketing, procurement, CRM, project management, and billing with distributor integration, including quoting that talks to Ingram and Synnex. That depth is also the main liability. New techs need weeks of training to do basic work. One Capterra reviewer described it as "very confusing if you don't train on it for at least a few weeks." Another called migrating their whole stack to ConnectWise a "regrettable decision." Every SelectHub user in the sample reported performance lag. Our ConnectWise PSA review goes deeper, and ConnectWise alternatives covers where teams go instead.

There is a real question buried in the depth. If you run 10 techs on a $9,000 contract for modules you never open, the fix is not better configuration. It is that the tier was sized for a different kind of business.

When it fits: 30+ techs, complex billing across cloud licensing and tiered agreements, deep distributor integrations, and someone internal or external who owns PSA configuration.

When it does not: Under 15 techs, no dedicated ops person, and no appetite for months of setup before you see value.

HaloPSA

HaloPSA publishes one all-in price per agent: $99 per agent per month billed annually up to 24 agents, $89 at 50, and $85 at 100 (Halo pricing page, October 2026). The calculator charges for at least five agents, which rules out solo operators, and every purchase needs an onboarding package priced by scope.

Satisfaction scores are the standout. SelectHub puts it at 97%, the highest in this category, and Capterra reviews consistently mention a modern interface, deep customization, and responsive support. One reviewer wrote that after trying "several systems, including many of the top names," HaloPSA was "the only one that has really delivered." Our HaloPSA review has the full breakdown.

The trade-off is that there is no built-in RMM, so you pair it with Datto RMM, NinjaOne, or something else. The configuration depth that power users value can also overwhelm a team that wants straightforward ticketing and billing, and several reviewers flag a learning curve on advanced reporting.

When it fits: 10-50 techs wanting a modern interface plus deep customization at published pricing, comfortable managing a separate RMM integration.

When it does not: Shops of 1 to 3 people who fall below the seat minimum, or teams that want RMM and PSA on one subscription.

Autotask PSA (Kaseya)

Autotask does not publish pricing. It sits inside the Kaseya ecosystem alongside Datto RMM, IT Glue, and the backup products. The PSA itself is mature, with strong contract management, usage-based billing, and solid SLA tracking.

The community context matters here. The 2021 supply-chain attack still surfaces in r/msp threads, and support quality complaints are common after the Datto acquisition. One Capterra reviewer noted that "the fact that Kaseya doesn't even use Autotask is definitely noteworthy." Another switched away and still found Autotask's interface "dated." Before you renew, read Kaseya CMQ billing so the invoice holds no surprises.

If you already run Datto RMM and IT Glue, the integration is tight and Autotask makes operational sense. Evaluating from scratch, the shortlists on r/msp tend to start with HaloPSA, SuperOps, or DeskDay. Our Autotask alternatives guide covers the full list, and IT Glue review covers the documentation side of the same bundle.

When it fits: Already inside the Kaseya and Datto ecosystem, with ticket-heavy operations on recurring support contracts.

When it does not: New to PSA, wary of lock-in, or sensitive to how a vendor handles renewals.

Kaseya BMS

Kaseya BMS is the lighter PSA in the Kaseya line, positioned below Autotask on both features and price. Pricing is quote-based; the third-party tracker ITQlick reports figures starting around $150 per user per month. It covers ticketing, time tracking, project management, billing, and inventory, and integrates natively with Kaseya VSA.

The product is not usually the deciding factor. Contract structure is. Multi-year terms and auto-renewal language show up repeatedly in community complaints, which is the theme of our Kaseya BMS review. Read the renewal clause before the feature list. If you are weighing an exit, the best Kaseya alternative compares seven options.

When it fits: Existing Kaseya VSA customers who want a PSA on the same paper and can negotiate the term length.

When it does not: Teams that want published pricing, month-to-month flexibility, or a short path out.

SuperOps

SuperOps starts at $149 (Pro) or $179 (Super) per technician per month billed monthly for the unified PSA, RMM and MDM plan, with 150 endpoints per technician and annual billing saving 15% (SuperOps pricing page, October 2026). It is the newest serious platform in this group and the interface shows it: clean, fast, with AI-driven ticket routing that G2 users rate 9.0 for ease of setup. Our SuperOps review covers what works and where it falls short.

The positioning is explicitly post-ConnectWise: core functionality without the legacy complexity. The integration ecosystem is still catching up, so if you depend on a specific QuickBooks workflow or a niche documentation tool, check compatibility before you commit. Reporting customization has not reached HaloPSA or ConnectWise levels.

When it fits: Under 50 techs, wanting a modern unified platform and comfortable with a vendor that is shipping features quickly. Strongest for teams starting fresh without legacy integrations to preserve.

When it does not: Complex billing, deep distributor integrations, or a requirement for extensive third-party connections that exist today rather than on a roadmap.

Atera

Atera publishes pricing at $129 (Pro) to $209 (Power) per technician per month billed annually, or $139 to $249 billed monthly, with a Superpower tier on custom quote (Atera pricing page, October 2026). The pitch is per-technician pricing with unlimited endpoints, RMM and PSA bundled, and AI Copilot included in every plan. Our Atera pricing 2026 breakdown covers the tiers. The full Atera review tests the platform itself.

The all-in-one model is the value. For a small team managing a lot of devices per technician, the math works well: one Capterra reviewer manages 250 devices with two techs and says the pricing makes sense at that ratio. Another switched because Atera "has the PSA side included in the price, unlike Pulseway's add-on price."

The trade-offs are consistent across G2 and Capterra. Ticketing depth is lighter than ConnectWise, HaloPSA, or a dedicated ITSM platform. Advanced reporting sits in higher tiers or paid add-ons. Read-only users still need full licenses, which inflates cost as an ops team grows. Atera's AI handles tier-1 categorization and basic resolution, which frees technician hours rather than replacing them. Budget for it accordingly and do not oversell it to clients. For the head-to-head against the other per-tech bundle, see Syncro vs Atera.

When it fits: 1-15 techs with a high device-to-tech ratio who want one platform and one bill.

When it does not: 20+ techs needing advanced ticket workflows, complex billing, or deep customization, and teams that lean hard on advanced reporting.

Syncro

Syncro bundles RMM and PSA at $129 per user per month (Core) or $179 (Team) billed annually, or $159 and $209 billed monthly, with unlimited endpoints and no per-device fees (Syncro pricing page, October 2026). Terms auto-renew, with cancellation 30 days before term end.

That pricing model is the entire proposition. You pay per technician, so onboarding a 200-endpoint client does not change your software bill, and you can put the agent on every machine you touch whether it is managed or not. For shops running a break-fix and managed mix, that is a meaningful difference.

The PSA side is functional rather than deep: ticketing, time tracking, invoicing, and a client portal. Reporting needs work, and several G2 reviewers mention exporting to Excel for anything beyond basics. Project management is thin. One reviewer captured the trade cleanly, saying Syncro "does everything I need it to do" and that per-technician pricing "was a huge feature, allowing us to put an agent on every single system we see."

When it fits: 1-10 techs running a break-fix and managed mix who want one platform without separate RMM and PSA bills.

When it does not: 20+ techs needing advanced project management, tiered billing, or enterprise-grade reporting.

DeskDay

DeskDay starts at $59 per tech per month on annual billing and $79 monthly, with no minimum seat count, free data migration, and a 14-day trial. Standard plans carry a one-time onboarding fee that is waived on Enterprise. It is the lowest-priced commercial PSA in this group by a clear margin.

The model is chat-first rather than form-first. End users raise tickets through Microsoft Teams, mobile, web, email, or desktop, and every channel feeds a single tech queue, which is a sharp contrast to form-based ticketing in tools like Jira Service Management. Helena, the built-in AI assistant, handles summarization, automated responses, and workflow triggers. Onboarding tends to run in days rather than weeks because there is little to configure.

The cautions are the flip side of being young: a smaller integration ecosystem than HaloPSA or ConnectWise, lighter reporting than legacy tools, and a smaller install base, so there are fewer peer reviews to learn from. The integration list is short but covers the common ground, with NinjaOne, Datto RMM, N-able N-central, and Level on the RMM side and QuickBooks, Xero, and Hudu for finance and documentation.

When it fits: 1-15 techs wanting a modern PSA at a low price point, with clients who live in Teams or chat-based support.

When it does not: 20+ techs with complex billing or procurement needs, or a requirement for mature integrations across a long vendor list.

Gorelo

Gorelo bundles PSA, RMM, and documentation in its Full Platform plan: $99 per technician per month billed annually, or $149 monthly (Gorelo pricing page, October 2026). That plan includes every feature, and cheaper PSA-only ($59) and co-managed ($39) licenses cover staff who do not need the whole platform.

The pricing is per technician rather than per endpoint, so a tech managing 600 devices costs the same as one managing 200. Set against a stitched stack, where an RMM seat, a PSA seat, a documentation subscription, and a remote-access license commonly land between $130 and $200 per technician per month combined, a flat $99 is the number that gets Gorelo onto shortlists. Our Gorelo review covers what the platform does and does not do yet.

The trade is maturity. Reporting depth and the integration catalog trail Atera and HaloPSA, and the install base is small enough that peer references are harder to find.

When it fits: Small to mid-sized teams consolidating four subscriptions onto one bill, where predictable flat pricing matters more than reporting depth.

When it does not: Teams needing mature third-party integrations, advanced reporting, or a long vendor track record.

ITFlow

ITFlow is the only zero-cost option here. Released on GitHub in 2019, it reached stable release in 2025 and is GPL-licensed, self-hosted on Ubuntu or Debian, with a one-line install script.

It covers ticketing with a client portal, asset and license tracking, client documentation, password management with AES encryption, accounting (quotes, invoices, recurring billing, Stripe), and domain and SSL renewal alerts. The AI integration supports self-hosted options such as Ollama and LocalAI alongside ChatGPT, which matters when client data should not leave your infrastructure.

What it does not cover: deep automation flows, advanced reporting, and pre-built connectors to commercial PSA platforms. There is no third-party security audit on the codebase, which the project documentation flags directly, and no paid support team, so you rely on community forums and GitHub issues. Our OpenMSP site goes deeper on production readiness in the ITFlow review and the open source PSA breakdown.

When it fits: 1-5 techs with the Linux skills to self-host, strong cost sensitivity, and a preference for full data ownership over polish.

When it does not: No Linux admin on the team, a need for vendor-backed SLAs, heavy reliance on automation or reporting, or compliance requirements that call for audited platforms.

Also Worth a Shortlist

Three more platforms come up in MSP evaluations often enough to name.

• Naverisk. All-in-one RMM and PSA aimed at small and mid-sized MSPs, with a long track record in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK.
• HarmonyPSA. Now part of Kaseya, strongest on subscription and usage billing for MSPs reselling cloud services.
• Accelo. Built for professional services businesses generally rather than MSPs, so retainer and project billing are strong while RMM integration is not.

Best PSA for Small MSPs and Solo Shops

Under five technicians, the calculation changes. Seat minimums rule out HaloPSA. Enterprise feature depth is money spent on modules nobody opens. What matters is a low floor and a short path to value.

Running on spreadsheets and email today. ITFlow removes PSA licensing as a line item entirely. The trade is operational overhead: a VPS, backups, updates, and the hours to maintain it. Worth it when there is Linux comfort on the team.

Want vendor support without a big bill. DeskDay at $59 per tech per month is the lowest commercial entry point, with no seat minimum. Gorelo at $99 flat buys RMM and documentation in the same line item.

Want RMM and PSA on one invoice. Syncro at $129 per user on annual billing, unlimited endpoints.

Managing a lot of devices per tech. Recheck the crossover table above before defaulting to per-tech pricing. Under roughly 60 to 150 devices per technician, a per-device platform such as OpenFrame costs less.

How to Choose PSA Software for Your MSP

This depends on where you are now, not just where you want to be.

Starting a new MSP, want one bill for everything. Syncro or Atera. Both bundle RMM and PSA on per-technician pricing with unlimited endpoints. Atera's reporting is more polished; Syncro wins on flexibility and simpler tiers.

5-15 techs, outgrowing your current tool. HaloPSA, SuperOps, or DeskDay. HaloPSA when customization depth matters and a separate RMM integration is acceptable. SuperOps for unified RMM and PSA with a modern interface. DeskDay when clients live in Microsoft Teams and speed-to-value beats feature depth.

30+ techs, considering leaving ConnectWise or Autotask. Run the numbers before the demos. Add your annual PSA cost, implementation consultant fees, and every add-on, then compare against HaloPSA at $85 to $99 per agent or SuperOps at $149 per technician. Verify your specific billing workflows and quoting integrations are supported before you commit, because that is where migrations stall.

Need maximum customization. ConnectWise PSA when the budget and a dedicated ops owner are both in place. HaloPSA for comparable depth at published pricing.

Planning the move itself. Switching a PSA is a 3 to 6 month project covering billing, ticketing, and workflow migration. ConnectWise and Autotask keep pricing off the website, so ask for renewal terms in writing. Run a stack audit first so you know what you are paying today, and read the MSP pricing playbook if the goal is protecting margin rather than cutting cost. Documentation migrates separately, and IT documentation for MSPs covers that piece.

Compare MSP tools at openmsp.ai · Learn about OpenFrame · Join the OpenMSP community