Flamingo Raises $4.5M Seed Round

Updated: August 2026

The Managed Service Provider (MSP) business model is often structured around a per-seat pricing approach. This setup bundles commercial software and IT services into cohesive packages that are sold to clients on a subscription basis, typically priced per user. While it provides simplicity and predictability for clients, this model positions MSPs less as service providers and more as software resellers - a distinction with significant financial implications.

Understanding the Financial Dynamics of MSPs

MSPs as Software Resellers

MSPs often rely on third-party products to deliver their services. These include tools like Microsoft 365, endpoint security solutions, and remote monitoring and management (RMM) software. Instead of providing proprietary solutions, MSPs act as intermediaries, reselling these products to their customers.

This arrangement introduces a fundamental challenge: as software resellers, MSPs face narrow profit margins, often limited to 20-30%. A significant portion of their revenue is immediately redirected to the original vendors in the form of licensing fees.

Top Cost Drivers

Vendor Payouts

  • Commercial Software Dependence: MSPs pay licensing fees for each product included in their bundles, which scale with the number of users. These vendor payouts often represent 20-35% of total revenue. The vendor lock-in trap makes these costs climb year after year.
  • Examples: Microsoft 365, antivirus programs, and backup solutions are typical expenses that erode profits.

Labor Costs

  • Technician Salaries: MSPs also rely heavily on skilled IT professionals to manage operations, handle client support, and maintain infrastructure. Technician salaries account for another 20-30% of revenue.
  • Rising Demand for Expertise: As technology grows more complex, MSPs face increasing pressure to hire high-cost, skilled workers, further squeezing margins.

Together, vendor payouts and labor costs can consume up to 60% of an MSP’s revenue, leaving little room for other operational expenses or significant profit.


The Per-Seat Model: A Tight Margin Business

MSPs sell per-seat packages, bundling third-party software under a unified subscription plan. While this simplifies offerings for clients, it reinforces the reseller dynamic and limits profitability. Adding to the challenge, labor-intensive support models drive up operational costs, further reducing margins.

For many MSPs, the result is a razor-thin profit margin of just 20-30%. Vendor licensing fees and technician salaries alone often consume the majority of revenue, making scalability and profitability a persistent challenge.


Conclusion

The per-seat MSP model, while effective for client convenience, often traps MSPs in a low-margin cycle. Acting primarily as software resellers rather than service providers, MSPs face significant financial constraints due to vendor payouts and labor costs. For these businesses to thrive, they must explore innovative strategies to reduce dependency on third-party software, streamline labor costs, and rethink how services are delivered.

As the industry evolves, MSPs embracing automation, open-source alternatives, and proprietary solutions will be best positioned to escape the limitations of the reseller model and achieve sustainable growth.

Michael Assraf

Founder and CEO

Hey everyone, I'm Michael - founder and CEO of Flamingo. Before this, I built Vicarius, a cybersecurity company focused on vulnerability remediation, where I raised over $60M in funding. Working closely with service providers through that journey, I saw firsthand how MSPs were losing money to vendor payouts and inefficient systems - and that's when the idea for Flamingo clicked. I set out to build an open-source platform that dramatically increases MSP margins while helping them deliver better service to their clients.

Related Content

Blog Posts

Product Releases

Podcasts

Webinars

Case Studies

Events

Onboarding Guides

Frequently Asked Questions

MSP Business Model

Per-seat pricing charges a flat monthly fee for each supported user, bundling software licences and IT services into one package. It is simple to quote and predictable to bill, which is why it became the default. It also ties revenue to headcount rather than to the work actually delivered.
Bundling licences into a per-seat package simplifies procurement for the client and adds recurring revenue for the provider. The tradeoff is that a large share of that revenue passes straight through to vendors, so the visible top line overstates what the MSP actually keeps.
Margin becomes dependent on vendor pricing decisions the MSP does not control. Annual uplifts, licence minimums, and bundle changes all compress profit without any change in service delivered. It also makes the business harder to differentiate, since competitors resell the same products.
It caps upside. Revenue scales with seat count while cost scales with ticket volume and tooling, and those two do not move together. A client with few users and heavy support needs erodes margin quietly, which is why seat-based contracts need periodic review against actual effort.
Per-device pricing tracks endpoints instead of people. Tiered packages sell defined service levels at fixed prices. Value-based pricing ties fees to outcomes such as uptime or compliance posture. Each shifts a different risk between provider and client, so the right one depends on your client mix.

About OpenFrame

OpenFrame isn't built to plug into your stack. It replaces it. Instead of duct-taping a dozen tools together (RMM, MDM, SIEM, patching, remote access, each its own login and bill), we bundle it into one unified platform: RMM, MDM, monitoring, automation, remote access, patch management, security monitoring, and ticketing, plus built-in AI copilots. So "does it integrate with X?" usually means: you won't need X anymore.
Most platforms give you one piece and expect you to bolt the rest on. OpenFrame unifies the whole stack in one place, with AI copilots built in. Fewer logins, fewer bills, less duct tape.
In the cloud, on US soil. Your data stays stateside.
Both. It's built for MSPs and MSSPs alike.

MSP AI Agents

Yes. In production MSP shops today, 10% to 25% of tickets close before a human opens them. Thread alone has processed 173 million tickets across 750-plus MSP partners at 96% triage accuracy, handing back 490,000-plus technician hours. Agents own the low-risk, high-volume work (password resets, MFA enrollment, known installs, onboarding and offboarding) and flag anything that touches production data or needs judgment for a human to take.