The Managed Service Provider (MSP) business model is often structured around a per-seat pricing approach. This setup bundles commercial software and IT services into cohesive packages that are sold to clients on a subscription basis, typically priced per user. While it provides simplicity and predictability for clients, this model positions MSPs less as service providers and more as software resellers — a distinction with significant financial implications.

Understanding the Financial Dynamics of MSPs

MSPs as Software Resellers

MSPs often rely on third-party products to deliver their services. These include tools like Microsoft 365, endpoint security solutions, and remote monitoring and management (RMM) software. Instead of providing proprietary solutions, MSPs act as intermediaries, reselling these products to their customers.

This arrangement introduces a fundamental challenge: as software resellers, MSPs face narrow profit margins, often limited to 20–30%. A significant portion of their revenue is immediately redirected to the original vendors in the form of licensing fees.

Top Cost Drivers

Vendor Payouts

  • Commercial Software Dependence: MSPs pay licensing fees for each product included in their bundles, which scale with the number of users. These vendor payouts often represent 20–35% of total revenue.
  • Examples: Microsoft 365, antivirus programs, and backup solutions are typical expenses that erode profits.

Labor Costs

  • Technician Salaries: MSPs also rely heavily on skilled IT professionals to manage operations, handle client support, and maintain infrastructure. Technician salaries account for another 20–30% of revenue.
  • Rising Demand for Expertise: As technology grows more complex, MSPs face increasing pressure to hire high-cost, skilled workers, further squeezing margins.

Together, vendor payouts and labor costs can consume up to 60% of an MSP’s revenue, leaving little room for other operational expenses or significant profit.


The Per-Seat Model: A Tight Margin Business

MSPs sell per-seat packages, bundling third-party software under a unified subscription plan. While this simplifies offerings for clients, it reinforces the reseller dynamic and limits profitability. Adding to the challenge, labor-intensive support models drive up operational costs, further reducing margins.

For many MSPs, the result is a razor-thin profit margin of just 20–30%. Vendor licensing fees and technician salaries alone often consume the majority of revenue, making scalability and profitability a persistent challenge.


Conclusion

The per-seat MSP model, while effective for client convenience, often traps MSPs in a low-margin cycle. Acting primarily as software resellers rather than service providers, MSPs face significant financial constraints due to vendor payouts and labor costs. For these businesses to thrive, they must explore innovative strategies to reduce dependency on third-party software, streamline labor costs, and rethink how services are delivered.

As the industry evolves, MSPs embracing automation, open-source alternatives, and proprietary solutions will be best positioned to escape the limitations of the reseller model and achieve sustainable growth.

Michael Assraf

Michael Assraf

Contributing author to the OpenMSP Platform