Pick the wrong IT documentation platform and you pay for it twice: once in license fees, and again every time a technician burns ten minutes hunting for a password that should have been one search away. Hudu is one of the two names that comes up most when MSPs go looking for a documentation tool, usually right next to IT Glue. So the real question isn't whether Hudu is good software. It's whether Hudu is the right fit for how your team works and what you're willing to spend.
This Hudu review breaks down pricing, features, integrations, where it beats IT Glue, and where it falls short, so owners and technicians can make the call without sitting through three sales demos.
TL;DR: Hudu Review
- Short answer. Hudu is a strong IT documentation platform for MSPs that want IT Glue's core capabilities without the five-user minimum, setup fees, or SaaS-only lock-in.
- Pricing. $27 per user/month billed annually ($30 monthly), every feature included, no user minimum, hosted or self-hosted at the same price.
- Best fit. Small to mid-size MSPs and internal IT teams that value transparent pricing, self-hosting options, and fast IT Glue migration.
- Watch out for. A smaller native PSA integration list than IT Glue, a mobile app with rough edges, and real setup effort to design your templates.
What Hudu Is and Who It Is For
Hudu is IT documentation software built for MSPs and internal IT teams. It gives you one place to store the things your techs reach for all day: client documentation, network details, encrypted passwords, IT assets, and step-by-step runbooks. The company says it's trusted by more than 5,500 IT departments and MSPs, which puts it firmly in the established-tool category rather than the risky-newcomer one.
The product centers on four pillars. Structured documentation with templates that force consistency, so every client folder looks the same instead of depending on which tech created it. Asset tracking with relationship mapping, so you can see that a specific firewall connects to a specific ISP circuit and a specific client site. Encrypted password management with granular permissions and two-factor authentication. And a searchable knowledge base for SOPs and how-to guides.
Who it fits: MSPs that have outgrown spreadsheets, shared OneNote files, or a wiki that nobody updates, and want a real system without committing to the most expensive option on the market. Who it doesn't: teams that need the deepest possible PSA integration ecosystem, or shops that want a documentation tool bundled into a single platform alongside their RMM and ticketing. More on that second group later.
Hudu Pricing: What You Really Pay
Hudu pricing is refreshingly easy to understand, which is rare in this category. It's $27 per user/month billed annually, or $30 per user/month if you pay monthly. That's it for the core product.
What's included at that price matters more than the number. Every plan gets unlimited documentation, unlimited companies, unlimited integrations, API access, SSO and SAML, and 24/7 support. There's no five-user minimum, no setup fee, and a 14-day free trial. The only paid add-ons are Hudu Radar (a monitoring product) and professional services if you want hands-on help with setup or migration.
Compare that to IT Glue, which requires a five-user minimum and charges onboarding fees. For a three-person shop, that difference is real money. Independent coverage has pegged Hudu as roughly 30 to 40 percent cheaper for small MSPs once you account for the minimum seats and onboarding costs IT Glue tacks on.
The other pricing detail worth flagging: self-hosting costs the same as cloud hosting. Most vendors charge a premium when you want to run software on your own infrastructure. Hudu doesn't. Whether you run it in their cloud or in your own Docker environment, you pay the same per-user rate. For MSPs with clients in regulated industries or strict data-residency requirements, that's a genuine advantage rather than a line-item upsell.
Core Features That Matter for MSPs
Documentation is the heart of it. Hudu's structured templates let you define what a "client onboarding" doc or a "firewall" asset should contain, then enforce that structure every time. The payoff is consistency: a tech covering for a sick colleague finds information where they expect it, not buried in someone's personal notes.
Hudu asset management goes beyond a flat list. You build relationships between assets, so a workstation links to its user, its location, its warranty, and the network gear it depends on. When something breaks at 2 a.m., that web of connections is what turns a vague alert into a fast fix.
Password management is encrypted, with permissions controlled down to the folder and group level plus two-factor authentication. Credentials live next to the documentation they relate to, which beats bouncing between a separate password manager and your docs.
For automation and custom work, Hudu ships a full REST API. The Hudu API is the piece that lets larger MSPs push and pull data programmatically, sync asset data from other systems, or build their own reporting. There's also a browser extension and a mobile app for updating docs on the go, though the mobile experience has limitations worth knowing about (covered in the cons below).
Self-hosting deserves one more mention because it's unusual. Hudu self-hosted runs in Docker on your own server, which appeals to MSPs that want full control of where client data lives. You take on the maintenance burden in exchange for that control. It's a trade-off, not a free win, but the option exists and costs nothing extra.
The one feature that sits outside the flat price is Hudu Radar, a paid add-on focused on monitoring. It's optional, so you only pay for it if the use case fits, but it's worth pricing separately rather than assuming it's bundled. Same goes for professional services: Hudu offers paid hands-on help for setup and migration, which is the kind of thing a busy MSP might want for a large IT Glue cutover and a smaller shop will happily skip. The point is that the core $27 covers the documentation platform itself, and the add-ons are genuinely optional rather than capabilities quietly held back to push you toward a higher bill.
Hudu vs IT Glue
This is the comparison most buyers are running, so let's make it concrete. IT Glue is the incumbent and the most widely deployed documentation platform in the MSP world. Hudu is the challenger that copies the parts MSPs like and fixes the parts they complain about. If you want a wider field of options, our roundup of IT Glue alternatives for MSP documentation covers where each one lands.
| Factor | Hudu | IT Glue |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $27/user/mo (annual) | Higher, quote-based |
| User minimum | None | 5 users |
| Setup/onboarding fee | None | Yes |
| Self-hosting | Yes, same price as cloud | No, SaaS only |
| Features by plan | All features on every plan | Tiered by plan |
| PSA integrations | Core PSAs covered, smaller list | Broader, more mature ecosystem |
| IT Glue migration | Automated migration tool | n/a |
| Maturity / track record | 5,500+ teams, growing | Longer history, large install base |
Where Hudu wins: simpler pricing, no minimum seats, self-hosting at no premium, and every feature on every plan instead of paywalling capabilities behind higher tiers. Where IT Glue wins: a longer security track record, a more mature feature set in places, and a broader integration ecosystem, especially for PSA platforms. If you're already deep in the Kaseya world, IT Glue's tighter fit there can matter.
Switching costs are usually the thing that keeps MSPs on IT Glue long after they've stopped loving it. Hudu addresses that directly with an automated IT Glue migration that handles data mapping, import, and validation before you go live, so you're not rebuilding hundreds of client docs by hand.
Hudu Integrations: Where It Connects and Where It Doesn't
Hudu integrations number more than 40 across PSA, RMM, security, and productivity tools. On the PSA side, it connects to ConnectWise PSA, Autotask, HaloPSA, Syncro, Kaseya BMS, Pulseway PSA, and SuperOps. On RMM, you get NinjaOne, Datto RMM, Atera, Addigy, and N-able. Security and productivity connections include Huntress, Google Workspace, Cisco Meraki, Auvik, and Cloudflare.
That's a solid list. It's also, by most accounts, a smaller native PSA ecosystem than IT Glue's. If your shop runs a less common PSA or depends on a specific deep sync, check the integration directory before you commit rather than assuming parity. Documentation that doesn't sync cleanly with your ticketing and monitoring tools loses a lot of its value, because the whole point is that a tech sees the right doc at the right moment without leaving the tool they're already in.
For teams thinking about how documentation fits with the rest of the stack, it helps to understand how the layers connect. Our explainer on what RMM is and how it works walks through how monitoring, ticketing, and documentation are supposed to feed each other.
Where Hudu Wins
The strengths show up consistently across user reviews and hands-on coverage:
- Pricing you can read in one sitting. Flat per-user cost, no minimum, no setup fee, every feature included. Finance teams and small MSPs both appreciate not needing a spreadsheet to model it.
- Self-hosting without the tax. Run it in your own Docker environment at the same price as cloud, which is rare and a real draw for compliance-sensitive clients.
- Ease of use and customization. Reviewers repeatedly praise how quickly non-technical staff pick it up, and how far the templates and custom fields bend to match real workflows.
One G2 reviewer summed up the sentiment as the best documentation system they'd used in 15 years, citing the automation and the breadth of integrations. Praise that specific, repeated across hundreds of reviews, is a signal worth weighting.
Where Hudu Falls Short
No tool earns a fair review without the rough edges, and Hudu has a few:
- The mobile app needs work. App store reviews cite session-management problems, missing asset-editing features, and biometric login issues. If your techs live on their phones in the field, test this hard during the trial.
- Search could be sharper. Several reviewers note that search works but isn't as fast or precise as they'd like once a documentation library gets large.
- Setup is real work. The flip side of deep customization is that you have to design your templates and structure up front. The pre-built templates help, but expect to invest time before it pays off.
None of these are dealbreakers on their own. They're the kind of trade-offs you accept knowingly, which is exactly why a 14-day trial with your own real data beats any review, including this one.
What Real Reviews Say
The aggregate scores back up the positive sentiment. On G2, Hudu holds a 4.7 out of 5 across more than 350 reviews, which is both a high rating and a large enough sample to trust. On Capterra, Hudu sits at 4.6 out of 5, though that score rests on a much smaller pool of about five reviews, with Value for Money and Ease of Use rated near 4.8. Treat the Capterra number as directional given the sample size, and lean on the G2 data for a clearer read.
Hudu has no Trustpilot business listing as of June 2026, so there's no third score to weigh there. Between G2's volume and Capterra's feature breakdown, the picture is consistent: users like the product, rate value highly, and the loudest complaints cluster around mobile and search rather than anything core to the documentation engine. Ratings also age, so check the current G2 page before you commit, since a tool's score shifts as new features ship and the review pool grows over time.
Documentation Is One Layer of the Stack
Here's the framing most Hudu reviews miss. Documentation isn't a standalone purchase. It's one layer of a stack that also includes RMM, PSA, and security tooling, and every layer you buy separately is another login, another bill, another integration to babysit. A standalone documentation tool like Hudu solves the documentation problem well. It doesn't shrink the number of vendors you manage.
That's worth sitting with if tool sprawl is the deeper pain. The MSPs feeling squeezed by margin compression usually aren't hurting because their documentation tool costs too much. They're hurting because they pay eight vendors for capabilities that increasingly overlap. If you're mapping out the broader category, our guide to IT documentation tools for MSPs lays out the options side by side.
This is where the all-in-one model enters the conversation. Flamingo is an AI-native, all-in-one MSP and IT platform that brings the layers together, with native PSA included rather than bolted on, and no vendor lock-in holding your data hostage. The OpenFrame platform behind it is built so documentation, ticketing, and monitoring live in one place instead of four. It's a different bet than buying a best-fit point tool for each job, and it isn't the right answer for every shop. But if the thing keeping you up at night is the total number of vendors rather than the quality of any single one, a consolidation play is worth pricing out alongside a standalone tool like Hudu.
The Call: Is Hudu Worth It?
For most small to mid-size MSPs choosing a dedicated documentation platform, Hudu is worth it. The pricing is honest, the feature set covers what techs need day to day, the G2 track record is strong, and the IT Glue migration removes the usual reason people stay stuck on a tool they've outgrown. It fits teams that want IT Glue's substance without the minimums, the setup fees, or the SaaS-only constraint.
It's a weaker pick if you depend on a deep, uncommon PSA integration, if your techs do most of their work from a phone, or if your real problem is the number of separate tools you're paying for rather than the quality of any one of them.
Run the trial with your own client data, push your actual PSA and RMM connections, and make your two least technical staff use it for a week. Documentation only earns its keep when the whole team reaches for it without being told to. The tool that wins that test is the one worth paying for.
Kristina Shkriabina
Kristina runs content, SEO, and community at Flamingo and OpenMSP. She spent years as a correspondent for Ukraine's Public Broadcasting Company before making the jump to tech. Now she covers MSP stack decisions and strategy. You can connect with her in the OpenMSP community or on LinkedIn.
