Flamingo Raises $4.5M Seed Round

Skip to content

Picking a productivity suite looks like a question about Word versus Docs, but the choice an IT team lives with is the admin console, the security tier and the migration that follows. Since Microsoft's July 2026 price change, the two platforms cost the same at every business tier, so price no longer settles it. This Microsoft 365 vs Google Workspace comparison covers what each one gives the people who run it: apps, admin, security, storage, migration and a checklist for picking.

TL;DR

  • Since July 1, 2026, Microsoft 365 Business Basic, Standard and Premium list at $7, $14 and $22 per user per month. Google Workspace Business Starter, Standard and Plus list at $7, $14 and $22 on the annual plan.
  • Microsoft 365 fits teams that live in desktop Excel, Outlook and Teams, run Windows fleets, or need conditional access and endpoint protection in the same seat.
  • Google Workspace fits browser-first teams, Chromebook and Mac shops, and offices that want one admin console with fewer settings to learn.
  • At $22, Business Premium bundles Intune, Entra ID P1 conditional access and Defender for Business. Business Plus bundles Vault, advanced endpoint management and Secure LDAP, and leaves DLP and context-aware access for Enterprise.
  • Both business tiers cap at 300 users. Neither suite is a backup.
  • Migration works in both directions with free first-party tools, but shared calendars, room bookings, file permissions and auto-replies need extra work.

The Short Answer by Business Type

Comparison posts tend to end with "it depends". Here's what it depends on, in the order an IT lead should ask.

Pick Microsoft 365 if the finance team builds models in desktop Excel, the fleet is Windows, a line-of-business app plugs into Outlook, or a client contract asks for device compliance checks before anyone opens email. Business Premium puts identity, device management and endpoint protection in one license, which is hard to match on the Google side without a third-party tool.

Pick Google Workspace if the team already works in the browser, the laptops are Chromebooks or Macs, and nobody needs macros that only run in desktop Office. The admin console is one place, the defaults are sensible, and a two-person IT function can run it without a certification path.

Keep what you have if neither list is a clear match. Switching suites costs a migration project, retraining and a month of "where did my file go" tickets. That cost needs a reason bigger than preference.

Microsoft 365 vs Google Workspace Pricing in 2026

Microsoft raised its commercial Microsoft 365 prices on July 1, 2026, per its December 2025 partner announcement. New and renewing customers pay the new list price; existing customers see it at their first renewal after that date. Business Basic went from $6 to $7, Business Standard from $12.50 to $14, and Business Premium stayed at $22.

That lands every Microsoft business tier on the same number as its Google counterpart. Our Google Workspace pricing breakdown has the per-plan detail for the Google side.

TierMicrosoft 365 (list, from July 1, 2026)Google Workspace (annual plan, September 2026)Google flexible plan
EntryBusiness Basic, $7Business Starter, $7$8.40
MiddleBusiness Standard, $14Business Standard, $14$16.80
Security tierBusiness Premium, $22Business Plus, $22$26.40
Above 300 usersE3, E5Enterprise, by quoteBy quote

Prices are US list, per user per month. Both vendors bundle an AI assistant into the base seat in some form, and both sell a paid AI tier on top. Compare the full seat cost including any add-on you'll buy anyway, such as a separate backup or email security product.

The real difference is in what each dollar buys at each step, and in how each vendor handles seats you no longer need. Google's flexible plan costs 20% more and lets you drop users any month. On an annual plan with either vendor, a seat you stop using keeps billing until renewal.

Here's what that looks like for a seasonal client. Twelve people sit on the $14 tier for the first four months, then eight for the rest of the year. On an annual plan with either vendor, that's 12 seats x $14 x 12 months = $2,016, because the four empty seats keep billing. On Google's flexible plan it's (12 x $16.80 x 4) + (8 x $16.80 x 8) = $806.40 + $1,075.20 = $1,881.60.

The flexible plan wins by $134.40 here, even at a 20% higher seat price. Flip the numbers (a stable team that never shrinks) and the annual plan wins every time. Seat count, not list price, is where the two platforms can end up costing different amounts.

Apps and How Your Team Works

This is the part end users notice first, and the part that causes the most tickets after a switch.

Microsoft 365 is desktop-first with a web layer. Business Basic gets the web and mobile versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint only. Business Standard and Premium add the installed desktop apps. Heavy Excel users (pivot tables over big data sets, Power Query, VBA macros) tend to hit the ceiling of any browser spreadsheet, including Excel's own web version.

Google Workspace is browser-first. Docs, Sheets and Slides were built for simultaneous editing, and sharing a link is the default way to collaborate. Offline mode exists, but it's opt-in per device and per user. Teams that write together all day often find Docs smoother than co-authoring in desktop Word.

Communication follows the same split. Microsoft puts chat, meetings, calls and file sharing into Teams. Google spreads them across Gmail, Chat and Meet. Neither is wrong; the question is which one your people already open first thing in the morning.

One practical test: count the files that matter. If the business runs on a handful of complex Excel workbooks or Word templates with macros, Microsoft 365 avoids a conversion project. If the files are mostly shared docs and simple sheets, Google Workspace won't slow anyone down.

Admin Experience: One Console or Several

Google Workspace runs from one place, the Admin console. Users, groups, devices, security settings, app settings and billing sit in the same tree. The settings list is shorter than Microsoft's, and the defaults lean safe. For an office manager who also runs IT, that matters.

Microsoft 365 spreads the job across several admin centers: the Microsoft 365 admin center for users and billing, Entra for identity and conditional access, Intune for devices, Defender for threats and Exchange for mail flow. Each one is deep. Together they cover more ground than Google's console, but the learning curve is steeper and settings live in more than one place.

For MSPs, the picture flips a little. Microsoft ships Microsoft 365 Lighthouse for partners, which shows security posture and alerts across customer tenants in one view. On the Google side, an MSP running Workspace for several clients works in each client's Admin console or adds a third-party tool for the cross-client view.

A good rule: count the admins. One part-time admin favours Google. A team with someone who already knows Intune and Entra gets more out of Microsoft.

Security at the $22 Tier

The top business tier is where the two suites differ most, and where an IT team feels the gap.

Microsoft 365 Business Premium includes three things that change how you secure a small business:

  • Conditional access. Microsoft's conditional access documentation says the feature needs Entra ID P1, and Business Premium customers can use it. Block sign-ins from outside the country, require a compliant device before Outlook opens, or force MFA for admins.
  • Intune. Enroll Windows, Mac, iOS and Android devices, push settings and apps, and wipe a lost laptop.
  • Defender for Business. Endpoint protection with detection and response, built on Defender for Endpoint and aimed at organizations up to 300 users.

Business Premium also carries Purview tools for sensitivity labels, data loss prevention and litigation hold on mailboxes.

Google Workspace Business Plus adds Vault for retention and legal holds, advanced endpoint management (password enforcement, remote wipe, iOS app management) and Secure LDAP for older apps and Wi-Fi gear. Data loss prevention, context-aware access and S/MIME wait for Enterprise. Endpoint protection on the laptops comes from a separate product.

So at the same price, Microsoft packs more device and identity control into the seat. Google keeps its setup simpler and relies on the browser and ChromeOS model for part of its protection. For a Chromebook fleet that works well. For Windows laptops holding local files, you'll add an endpoint product on the Google side.

The lower tiers matter too. Microsoft's security defaults (MFA for everyone, legacy authentication blocked) work on every plan, and Google offers 2-step verification on every plan. Turn both on, whatever else you buy. Our guide to IAM solutions covers what an identity layer adds beyond them.

This r/sysadmin thread is a useful read from people making the same call for a growing company:

Storage, Email and Backup

Storage works differently on each side. Google Workspace pools storage across the organization: 30 GB per user on Business Starter, 2 TB on Standard and 5 TB on Plus, shared by everyone on the plan. Microsoft 365 gives each user a mailbox and 1 TB of OneDrive, with SharePoint storage for the organization on top. Microsoft's 2026 update also adds 50 GB of email storage to all three Business plans.

Pooled storage suits teams where a few people hold big video or design files and everyone else barely uses any. Per-user storage is easier to reason about when you're sizing mailboxes and planning retention.

Neither suite is a backup. Both keep deleted items for a while, and both offer retention tools, but a retention policy isn't a restore point you control. Our Microsoft 365 backup guide explains where Microsoft's protection stops, and the same shared-responsibility logic applies to Google. Budget a third-party backup on either platform.

Migrating Between Them

Both vendors ship free first-party tools to pull users in from the other side. Neither moves everything.

Google Workspace to Microsoft 365. Microsoft's Google Workspace migration guide moves mail and rules, calendars and contacts in batches of users. You provision the users first and set up routing subdomains on both sides. Room bookings, shared calendars, event colours and vacation and auto-reply settings don't come across. Gmail filters arrive as Outlook rules switched off, so users need to check them before turning them on.

Files move separately. Migration Manager copies Google Drive content to OneDrive and SharePoint, and a Lite version turns on by default for tenants with fewer than 300 licenses. File-level permissions and older file versions only migrate if you enable them in the project settings, so check those before the first run.

Microsoft 365 to Google Workspace. Google's data migration service imports mail from Exchange Online, plus files from OneDrive and SharePoint, from inside the Admin console.

The gotchas are the same in both directions:

  1. Shared calendars and rooms. Plan to rebuild them by hand.
  2. Permissions. Map identities first, then check who can see what after the move.
  3. Retention and archive policies. Microsoft recommends switching off mailbox retention and archive policies during migration, because items they move get flagged as missing and hide real data loss.
  4. Native files. Google Docs, Sheets and Slides convert to Office formats on the way out. Complex formatting and scripts don't always survive.
  5. Mail cutover. Lower the MX record TTL a few days early and pick a quiet cutover window.

This video walks through both suites from the point of view of an IT provider that sets them up for small businesses:

A Checklist for Picking One

Score each question for your client or your own team. Three or more answers in one column usually settles it.

QuestionPoints to Microsoft 365Points to Google Workspace
Where do people work?Desktop apps, Outlook add-insBrowser, shared links
What devices?Windows laptopsChromebooks, Macs
Who runs IT?Someone who knows Entra and IntuneOne part-time admin
Security need at $22?Conditional access, endpoint protection in the seatVault, legal holds, simpler controls
Key files?Complex Excel models, macros, Word templatesShared docs, light spreadsheets
Compliance asks?Device compliance before accessRetention and eDiscovery
Growth past 300 users?E3 or E5Enterprise

If the score is close, stay where you are and spend the migration budget on security and backup instead. A tidy tenant on either suite beats a half-finished move.

The same question comes up on the user side too. This r/Office365 thread asks what each suite does better:

Running Either Suite for Clients

For an MSP, the suite is one layer. The devices, patching and backups underneath need the same work either way.

On the Microsoft side, Intune can take on a lot of device management, and our look at Microsoft Intune for MSPs covers where it stops. On the Google side, Business Plus handles the basics, and a separate tool fills the gaps on Windows. Our MDM solutions comparison covers the options for mixed fleets.

Two habits pay off on both platforms. Run a quarterly software license audit so idle seats don't renew for another year. And put retention holds on a leaver's account before you delete it.

OpenFrame, Flamingo's open, AI-native infrastructure layer for IT and security, can run a script across a client's devices and collect the output, which helps when you need to know which Office build or Drive for desktop version is on each laptop before a migration.

The Short Version

Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace now cost the same at $7, $14 and $22. Pick Microsoft 365 for desktop Office, Windows fleets and more security in the $22 seat. Pick Google Workspace for browser-first teams, Chromebooks and a simpler admin console. Budget a backup on either one, and plan migrations around the things neither tool moves: shared calendars, rooms, auto-replies and permissions. For the Google plan detail, read our Google Workspace pricing guide next.

Conrad Lunderstedt

Conrad Lunderstedt

Solution Architect

I'm Conrad, Solution Architect at Flamingo. I've spent about 26 years in IT, roughly half of it inside MSPs and the rest in enterprise environments, so I've watched vendor decisions get made on both sides of that line. Now I spend my days talking with MSPs about the stack they already run, and helping them work through the requests and issues that come with it.

Related Content

Blog Posts

Product Releases

Podcasts

Webinars

Case Studies

Events

Onboarding Guides

Frequently Asked Questions

Microsoft 365 vs Google Workspace

Neither, at list price. Since July 1, 2026, Microsoft 365 Business Basic, Standard and Premium cost $7, $14 and $22 per user per month, the same as Google Workspace Business Starter, Standard and Plus on the annual plan. The cost can differ through seat count: Google's flexible plan costs 20% more but lets you drop users any month, while annual seats on either side bill until renewal.
At the $22 tier, Microsoft 365 Business Premium puts more security in the seat: conditional access through Entra ID P1, Intune device management and Defender for Business endpoint protection. Google Workspace Business Plus adds Vault, advanced endpoint management and Secure LDAP, and keeps data loss prevention and context-aware access for Enterprise. Both offer MFA on every plan.
Yes. Microsoft's migration batches move mail, rules, calendars and contacts, and Migration Manager moves Google Drive files to OneDrive and SharePoint. Shared calendars, room bookings, auto-replies and file permissions need extra steps, so plan those before the cutover.
It works, but a Windows fleet gets less from it. Google Workspace doesn't include endpoint protection, so Windows laptops need a separate security product, and teams that depend on desktop Excel or Outlook add-ins may face a conversion project. Browser-first teams on Chromebooks or Macs get the most from Workspace.
No. Both keep deleted items for a limited time and offer retention tools, but a retention policy is not a restore point you control. Budget a third-party backup on either platform.

About OpenFrame

OpenFrame isn't built to plug into your stack. It replaces it. Instead of duct-taping a dozen tools together (RMM, MDM, SIEM, patching, remote access, each its own login and bill), we bundle it into one unified platform: RMM, MDM, monitoring, automation, remote access, patch management, security monitoring, and ticketing, plus built-in AI copilots. So "does it integrate with X?" usually means: you won't need X anymore.
Most platforms give you one piece and expect you to bolt the rest on. OpenFrame unifies the whole stack in one place, with AI copilots built in. Fewer logins, fewer bills, less duct tape.
In the cloud, on US soil. Your data stays stateside.
Both. It's built for MSPs and MSSPs alike.

MSP AI Agents

Yes. In production MSP shops today, 10% to 25% of tickets close before a human opens them. Thread alone has processed 173 million tickets across 750-plus MSP partners at 96% triage accuracy, handing back 490,000-plus technician hours. Agents own the low-risk, high-volume work (password resets, MFA enrollment, known installs, onboarding and offboarding) and flag anything that touches production data or needs judgment for a human to take.